June 6th, 2008
September 8-10, 2008
September 10-13, 2008
|
Preliminary Programme
|
ESMAC Keynote Lectures
|
Half-day ESMAC Seminars
|
ESMAC GAIT COURSE
|
Workshops/Panels
|
Keynote Speakers
|
John Patrick
|
ORLAU/Movement Analysis Service, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District
Hospital, UK.
Topic: From Childhood to the Geriatric Age: the challenges of gait rehabilitation. |
|
Casey Kerrigan
|
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Virginia School
of Medicine, USA.
Topic: Clinical Gait Analysis. |
|
Turgut Tümer
|
Middle East Technical University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ankara,
Turkey.
|
Invited Lecturers
|
Zeevi Dvir
|
Sackler Faculty of Medicine TAU, Israel.
Topic: Determination of change in rehabilitation.
|
|
Uri Givon
|
Sheba Medical Center Tel Aviv, Israel.
Topic: Muscular weakness in childern.
|
|
Patrice L. (Tamar) Weiss
|
Dept. of Occupational Therapy Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences University
of Haifa, Israel.
Topic: Virtual reality.
|
Half-day ESMAC Seminars
1. Musculoskeletal Modelling
|
Caroline Stewart
|
Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Hospital Orthopaedic Hospital Dept. of Orlau Oswestry,
Shropshire United Kingdom.
|
|
Andrew Roberts
|
Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Hospital Orthopaedic Hospital Dept. of Orlau Oswestry,
Shropshire United Kingdom.
|
|
Lennart Scheys
|
K.U. Leuven Med. Image Computing/Lab. of Ergonomics Belgium.
|
|
Ilse Jonkers
|
K.U. Leuven Dept. of Biomedical Kinesiology Belgium.
|
|
Mike Schwartz
|
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Center for Gait and Motion Analysis ST.
PAUL, MN USA.
|
|
Iain Charlton
|
Vicon Dept. of Development Oxford UK.
|
Muscle Length
- Calculation of Muscle Length
- Validation of Muscle Length Measurements
- Clinical Significance of Muscle Length Measurements
- Practical utility of Muscle Length Measurements
IAA and Forward Dynamics
- Implementation of IAA and Forward Dynamics
- Validation of IAA and Forward Dynamics
- Clinical Significance of IAA and Forward Dynamics
- Practical Utility of IAA and Forward Dynamics
Extraction of Model Parameters from Imaging
- Implementation of Extraction of Model Parameters from Imaging
- Validation of Extraction of Model Parameters from Imaging
- Clinical Significance of Extraction of Model Parameters from Imaging
- Practical Utility of Extraction of Model Parameters from Imaging
Modelling of Marker Placement
- Calculation of Optimisation of Marker placement
- Validation of Optimisation of Marker placement
- Clinical Significance of Optimisation of Marker placement
- Practical Utility of Optimisation of Marker placement
2. What can Gait Analysis offer Prosthetics?
|
James Robb
|
Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Edinburgh, UK.
|
|
Tony McGarry
|
National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics, University of Strathclyde, UK.
|
|
Susan Hillman
|
National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics, University of Strathclyde, UK.
|
|
Steven Gard
|
Motion Analysis Research Laboratory, Nothwestern University, Chicago, USA.
|
|
Klaas Postema
|
Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
|
Principles of prosthetic practice and design. Tony McGarry
Clinical gait analysis for prosthetics. Susan Hillman
Approaches to motion analysis in prosthetic research and development Steven Gard
Applications of gait analysis in prosthetic research. Klaas Postema
3. Quality of Life
|
Adam Shortland
|
One Small Step Gait Laboratory, Guy's Hospital, St. Thomas St. London, UK.
|
|
Susan Ishoy Michelsen |
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark. |
|
Christine Eiser |
Child Health Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK |
|
Marie Claude Simeoni |
Public Health, University Hospital of Marseille, France |
Susan Ishoy Michelsen is a medical doctor working as a researcher at the National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark. Her main interest is children and adults with disabilities. She has studied the social consequences of cerebral palsy in adulthood, focusing on participation on the labour market, education, financial situation as well as independent living and cohabitation. She is the Danish local coordinator of SPARCLE, a study of children with cerebral palsy living in Europe. SPARCLE examines how participation and quality of life in 8-12- year- old children with cerebral palsy relate to their environment.
Christine Eiser trained at the University of Bristol and the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London. She is currently Professor of Child Health Psychology, at the University of Sheffield. Her main research interests have focused on psychosocial implications of childhood cancer for children and their families. She has written over 100 peer reviewed articles and several books (Children with Cancer: Quality of Life. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004). Her current interests include the late effects of cancer treatments on psychological functioning and quality of life in both children and young adults after cancer.
Marie Claude Simeoni is a medical doctor, graduated in public health and health economics. She is currently working in a public health department at the University Hospital of Marseille (France). Her specific areas of interest include health and quality of life of children and adolescents, and patients with mental illnesses. Her researches have focused on development, validation and use of quality of life measurement and patient-reported outcomes including more recently the study of impact of cognitive impairment on self-reported outcomes.
4. Movement analysis of upper extremity
Mick Kreulen
Mark Smeulders
|
Amsterdam.
Topic: 3D kinematics analyses to inform muscle tendon surgery in the upper
extremity.
|
Carolien van Andel
Dirk Jan Veeger
Jaap Harlaar
|
Amsterdam.
Topic: The ISB model for the UX.
|
|
Andrea Cutti
|
Bologna.
Topic: Upper extremity kinematics analysis based on inertial sensors.
|
Oliver Rettig
Sebastian Wolf
|
Heidelberg.
Topic: An upper-extremity model using functional methods with a minimal marker
set.
|
Jon Davids
Laura Peace
|
Greenville SC, USA.
Topic: The SHUEE as a basis for UX kinematic analysis.
|
|
Lena Krumlinde
|
Stockholm
Topic: What is a functional assisting hand ?
|
Summary
In a context of rehabilitation medicine and orthopedics, the discipline of Clinical
Movement Analysis (CMA) aims to provide an objective and quantitative description
of the functions of muscles and joints when the subject executes a relevant task.
This has become feasible since the technological developments of the last 30 years,
i.e. optoelectronic recording of 3D kinematics, ground reaction forces and ElectroMyoGraphy
(EMG). The goal of such analyses is to provide relevant information for informed
clinical decision making. The main application area was/is functions of the lower
extremities in gait in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP), but has been extended
to gait in other pathologies (children and adults) as well. Recently the application
area of CMA has extended to upper extremity (UX) functions in relevant tasks.
Technically the unequivocal prescription of functions of the shoulder, elbow and
wrist is now possible and more detailed functions of the hand are expected to follow.
Application area is to inform surgical interventions in e.g. CP, OPBL, and trauma.
Also and degenerative (Btx-A) treatment in CP require careful indication. As a starting
point, one of the main decisions that CMA has to come forward with, is which UX
tasks should be in some kind of focus. There is no single task (like gait for the
LX) that is clearly the most relevant. Unilateral UX tasks are the basis of the
first studies, which seem a natural choice.
However, from a broader functional perspective, this is not then case for unilateral
pathologies (CP hemiplegia, OPBL, trauma). Since, even the best treatment (as a
result of CMA informed decision making) will probably not restore the UX to be the
functional favorable side to use in unilateral tasks. Alternatively focusing on
(symmetric) bimanual tasks or tasks supporting unilateral tasks, would probably
be of most functional benefit to the patient.
A second main point of attention is which marker models should be used to reliably
describe the kinematics of the upper extremity and the associated biomechanical
models, which are used to infer muscle functions from that.
The complexity of the model should be tuned towards the specific kind of information
that is necessary to inform clinical decision making. A straight forward application
is that of the ISB, which are superseded by models that use functional optimization.
However, recent sensor innovations (inertial sensing) enable easy to apply evaluations
outside the lab.
ESMAC GAIT COURSE
Date: September 8-9-10, 2008
Duration: Three full-days (09:00-17:30)
Location: Gloria Golf Convention Center
Capacity: Up to 60 participants with registration on first come first served basis
Target Audience:
Clinicians and researchers currently working in a gait laboratory
Clinicians and researchers who plan to work in a gait laboratory
Clinicians interested in movement analysis of adults or children
Clinicians, surgeons or engineers who want to gain a detailed insight of gait analysis
Clinical directors who plan to establish a gait laboratory in his/her clinic.
Learning Objectives
By participation in this course, participants will be able to:
Make visual gait analysis
Recognize the phases of gait cycle
Define the kinematic events occuring during the gait cycle
Define the kinetic events occuring during the gait cycle
Visit a comprehensive gait laboratory, observe and participate in an interactive gait analysis session to be settled in the Gloria Golf Convention Center.
|
H. Gok Turkey |
J. Stebbins
UK |
|
B. B. Westhoff Germany |
Malgorzata Syczewska Poland |
|
C. Stewart UK |
R. Brunner
Switzerland |
|
I. Jonkers Belgium |
S. Gibbs UK |
|
B. Muller Spain |
T. Theologis UK
|
|
J. Robb UK |
M. Walsh Ireland |
Preliminary Programme
|
Time
|
Duration
|
Title
|
Format
|
Lecturer
|
|
09.00-09.15
|
15 min
|
Welcome & Introduction
|
Lecture
|
|
|
09.15-09.45
|
30 min
|
Gait analysis:Terminology
|
Lecture
|
M. Walsh |
|
09.45-10.30
|
45 min
|
Video observation of (normal) walking
|
Lecture
|
M. Walsh |
|
10.30-11.00
|
30 min
|
Coffee
|
|
|
|
11.00-11.45
|
45 min
|
Relation between the assessment of motor potential (Clinical assessment)
and motor function as observed through video analysis
|
Lecture
|
S. Gibbs |
|
11.45-12.30
|
45 min
|
Clinical Examination
|
Lecture
|
M. Walsh |
|
12.30-13.30
|
60 min
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
13.30-14.00
|
30 min
|
Clinical Assessment: A Round-up
|
Lecture
|
S. Gibbs |
|
14.00-14.45
|
45 min
|
Workshop 1: Relation between the assessment of motor potential and
motor function as observed through video analysis – case studies
|
Workshop
|
|
|
14.45-15.30
|
45 min
|
Workshop 2: Relation between the assessment of motor potential and
motor function as observed through video analysis – case studies continued
|
Workshop
|
|
|
15.30-16.00
|
30 min
|
Coffee
|
|
|
|
16.00-16.30
|
30 min
|
Introduction to kinematic modelling: From movement on video to kinematic
graph
|
Lecture
|
C. Stewart |
|
16.30-17.30
|
60 min
|
Workshop 3: Kinematics:normal and altered walking
|
Workshop
|
|
|
Time
|
Duration
|
Title
|
Format
|
Lecturer |
|
09.00-09.15
|
15 min
|
Round Up Day 1
|
Lecture
|
|
|
09.15-10.00
|
45 min
|
Introduction to kinetics: Physics
|
Lecture
|
C. Stewart |
|
10.00-10.45
|
45 min
|
Joint moments during walking
|
Lecture
|
I. Jonkers |
|
10.45-11.15
|
30 min
|
Coffee
|
|
|
|
11.15-12.00
|
45 min
|
Joint power and EMG during walking
|
Lecture
|
I. Jonkers |
|
12.00-13.00
|
60 min
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
13.00-14.00
|
60 min
|
Workshop 4: Joint moments during walking
|
Workshop
|
|
|
14.00-14.30
|
30 min
|
Marker placement: sources of error
|
Lecture
|
M. Syczewska |
|
14.30-15.00
|
30 min
|
Coffee
|
|
|
|
15.00-16.00
|
60 min
|
A kinesiological reference frame for data interpretation
|
Lecture
|
R. Brunner |
|
16.00-17.00
|
60 min
|
Workshop 5: Case Discussion I
|
Workshop
|
|
|
17.00-17.30
|
30 min
|
Relation between the assessment of motor potential and motor function as observed
in the kinematics/kinetics and EMG – Part1
|
Lecture
|
S. Gibbs |
|
Time
|
Duration
|
Title
|
Format
|
Lecturer |
|
09.00-09.30
|
30 min
|
Relation between the assessment of motor potential and motor function as observed
in the kinematics/kinetics and EMG – Part2
|
Lecture
|
A. Roberts |
|
09.30-11.00
|
90 min
|
Workshop 6: Case Discussion II
|
Workshop
|
|
|
11.00-11.30
|
30 min
|
Coffee
|
|
|
|
11.30-13.00
|
90 min
|
Workshop 7: Case Discussion III
|
Workshop
|
|
|
13.00-14.00
|
60 min
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
14.00-14.30
|
30 min
|
Recommendations for quality assurance
|
Lecture
|
C. Stewart |
|
14.30-16.30
|
120 min
|
Workshop 8: Gait Lab session
|
Workshop
|
|
|
16.30-17.00
|
|
Closure
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Until June 20th , 2008
|
After June 20th , 2008
|
|
Monday to Wednesday
|
Members*
|
400 Euro
|
450 Euro
|
|
Non- members
|
450 Euro
|
500 Euro
|
|
Students
|
250 Euro
|
300 Euro
|
* ESMAC, GCMAS, SIAMOC, Supporting Turkish Societies.
Registration
Online registration is open. Plese complete the form
https://secure.eventmagix.com/RegForms/esmac2008/
Course fee includes all course materials, course manual, lunches and refreshments,
and social events.
Places will be allocated on a 'first come, first serve' basis with respect to the
date of receipt of payment.
Workshops/Panels
1. Gait Assessment and Training: Stepping From Mechanistic Research to Practice
Workshop Speakers
|
Janice Eng
|
University of British Columbia, Canada.
|
|
Diane Damiano
|
Washington University, USA.
|
|
Sandra Olney
|
Queen's University in Kingston, Canada.
|
|
Meg Morris
|
University of Melbourne, Australia.
|
Following the workshop, the participant should be able to:
- Discuss neural and biomechanical mechanisms which influence gait function
- Be able to evaluate treatment approaches to improve gait with respect to mechanisms
underlying impaired gait.
- Formulate treatment decisions for improving gait based on an understanding of the
mechanisms contributing to impaired gait.
Workshop Summary:
Gait requires the integration of many systems (e.g., muscle, neural, cognitive,
cardiovascular, proprioceptive, visual) to generate a multi-degree, rhythmical human
gait pattern which is robust, yet adaptable depending on the environment and task.
This workshop will evaluate the role of different mechanisms underlying impaired
gait and discuss the development of new and innovative, evidence-based treatments
to improve gait function. In particular, the application of movement analysis will
be addressed as a tool for assessment and developing appropriate treatments to improve
walking. Although different populations will be discussed (e.g., stroke, cerebral
palsy, Parkinson's disease), commonalities in the presentations include the use
of gait kinematics and kinetics, the knowledge of muscle and neural requirements
during gait, and the appreciation of the complex coordination of multiple systems
for effective gait.
- From gait analysis to clinical trials to improve walking in stroke
Janice J. Eng
- 3-D analysis of novel therapeutic strategies to improve gait in CP
Diane L. Damiano
- Biomechanical insight into questions about gait in persons with stroke
Sandra J. Olney
- Using gait analysis in parkinson disease to enhance therapy outcomes
Meg E. Morris
Biographies
Janice J. Eng, is Professor, Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate
Program of Rehabilitation Sciences at the University of British Columbia and Scientist
at the GF Strong Rehab Centre in Vancouver, Canada. She is a Canadian Institutes
of Health Research and Michael Smith Foundation of Health Research Senior Scholar.
Her research applies principles of rehabilitation, neurophysiology, exercise physiology,
and mechanics to investigate the effects of neurological impairments on movement
and function. Her clinical trials to improve mobility have addressed gait, falls,
cardiovascular fitness, arm function, muscle strength, quality of life and bone
health. She currently serves on the Editorial Board of the journal Physical Therapy.
Diane L. Damiano, is a Research Associate Professor of Neurology at
Washington University, St Louis and Director of a 3-D motion laboratory there. She
received her MS degree in physical therapy from Duke University and her PhD from
the University of Virginia in 1993. She is recognized internationally for her work
on muscle strengthening and other strategies aimed at improving gait and motor function
in cerebral palsy. She is a member of the APTA Pediatric and Research Sections,
the current President of the American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental
Medicine, and a charter member and past president of the Gait and Clinical Movement
Analysis Society.
Sandra J. Olney, is Professor Emeritus at Queen's University in Kingston,
Ontario, Canada, Director and Associate Dean of the Faculty of Health Sciences (1997-2006).
Her research has focused on understanding the biomechanics of human gait, applying
the findings to improving performance and reducing disability, and assessing aerobic
and strength training programs for people who have sustained a stroke. She served
as President of the International Society of Biomechanics from 2001-2003 and currently
sits on the editorial board of Clinical Biomechanics and the Advisory Board of the
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.
Meg E. Morris, is Head of the School of Physiotherapy at The University
of Melbourne, Australia. She is a Fellow of the Australian College of Physiotherapists
and specializes in physiotherapy and gait disorders in Parkinson disease. She has
over 120 journal publications and has supervised 16 PhD students and 3 post-doctoral
fellows. Her research grants include a Michael J Fox Clinical Discovery Grant, a
US National Parkinson Disease Association grant and several NHMRC Grants, including
one to establish a Clinical Centre of Excellence in Gait. She is also associate
editor of the journal Gait & Posture.
|
Janice Eng
|
Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences,
University of BCGF Strong Rehab Centre Vancouver, Canada.
|
|
Diane Damiano
|
Washington University, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, USA.
|
|
Sandra Olney
|
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
|
|
Meg Morris
|
School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
|
2. Gait & Balance Disorders: Neurological Perspective and Posturograpic Approach
|
Yakup Sarıca
|
Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Neurology, Adana, Turkey.
|
|
Neşe Çelebisoy
|
Ege University Faculty of Medicine Department of Neurology, İzmir, Turkey.
|
|
Meltem Demirkıran
|
Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Neurology, Adana, Turkey.
|
1. Potential uses of static posturograpy in neurology. Yakup Sarıca
2. Static Posturograpy in central and peripheral vestibulopathies. Neşe Çelebisoy
3. Static posturography in sensory and cerebellar ataxias. Meltem Demirkıran
Target Audience: Clinicans who are interested in gait and balance disorders
Learning Objectives: By participation in this session, participants will
be able to learn the neurological perspective of gait and balance disorder as well
as the clinical uses and contribution of posturography in cases with central and
vestibular lesions and with peripheral neuropathy and cerebellar disorders.
3. Gait Analysis in Diabetes
|
Nesrin Demirsoy |
Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey. |
|
Salih Angın
|
School of Physiotherapy, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
|
|
Hans Savelberg
|
Dept. Human Movement Science, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht
University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
|
|
Carine H.M. van Schie
|
Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
Claudia Giocomozzi
|
Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy.
|
Medical Doctors (PM&R, Vascular Surgeons, Endocrinologists, Orthopedic Surgeons),
Podiatrists, Biomedical Engineers, Physical Therapists, Prosthetists and Orthotists,
Rehabilitation Nurses
By participation in this symposium, participants will be able to
- Review underlying causes of the effects of Diabetes Mellitus on muscle activation
and its innervation,
- Know associations between muscle weakness and the gait deviations,
- Understand intrinsic foot muscle atrophy, foot deformities and their effects on
gait and plantar pressure, and importance of early identification of the risks for
neuropathic foot ulcers
- Know common kinematic and kinetic changes in gait pattern and plantar pressure alterations
in diabetic patients.
4. Movement Analysis in Sports
Moderators: Feza Korkusuz and Mustafa Karahan
|
Mustafa Karahan
|
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,
Istanbul, Turkey.
|
|
Selim Yalçın and Nadire Berker
|
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,
Istanbul, Turkey.
|
|
Torn Krosshaug
|
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norway.
|
|
Feza Korkusuz
|
Middle East Technical University, Department of Physical Education and Sports, and
Medical Center, Ankara, Turkey.
|
- Motion analysis of throwing. Mustafa Karahan
- Application of motion analysis for training in rowing, running and other sports:
Is it really worth the effort? Selim Yalçın and Nadire Berker
- Video analysis of the mechanisms for ACL injuries. Torn Krosshaug
- Middle East Technical University experience. Feza Korkusuz
Following the workshop, the participant should be able to:
- Discuss shoulder and elbow motion specific to the overhead athlete during throwing.
- Understand the controversies related to the application of motion analysis in sports
training
- Understand the mechanisms underlying ACL injuries and the methods to prevent them.
- Share experience of movement analysis in sport at laboratory and field settings.
Workshop Summary:
Sports injuries are major socio-economic burden for the society in addition to its
toll on the individual athlete. More research has been done on the treatment methods
of sport injuries than prevention methods. In order to prevent injuries, mechanism
of injuries should be clearly defined. Motion analysis is one of the best methods
to delineate injury mechanisms. In this session, features of motion-analysis, pitfalls
of video-analysis will be discussed. Further insight into features of overhead athletic
activities and prevention of ACL injuries will be revealed. Share experience of
movement analysis in sport at laboratory and field settings.
Biographies
Mustafa Karahan, Professor of Orthopedics and Traumatology at Marmara University
in İstanbul, Turkey. He is also the director of the Sports Sciences and Sports Health
Research and Application Center at the same center. He is actively involved in the
sports injuries of the shoulder, knee and ankle and their arthroscopic treatment
and prevention of sports injuries. He is in the health subcommittee of the National
Olympic Committee and various sports federations. He is a member of Turkish Sports
Traumatology and Arthroscopic Surgery Association, ESSKA, ISAKOS, AOSSM.
Selim Yalcin, Professor of of Orthopedics and Traumatology at Marmara University
in İstanbul, Turkey. A competitive rower and runner for over 30 years. He is an
amateur rowing, running and sailing coach and has been an active member of the rowing
federation. He is the coauthor of the first Turkish gait analysis book. He founded
the Marmara University Gait Analysis Laboratory in 2001. He treats many young rowers,
sailors and swimmers.
Nadire Berker, Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, currently
working at the VKV American Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. She is a competitive masters
runner, rower and sailor. She is the coauthor of the first Turkish gait analysis
book and co-founder of the Marmara University Gait Analysis Laboratory in 2001.
She has extensive experience of clinical gait analysis in cerebral palsy and spina
bifida.
Tron Krosshaug, PhD is a researcher at the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center.
He has a masters degree in biomechanics from the University of Sport and Physical
Education. He has also taken several mathematics, mechanics and robotics courses
at the University of Oslo. He defended his PhD thesis on the topic "Video analysis
of the mechanisms for ACL injuries" in August 2006. Krosshaug also functions as
a computer consultant for the research group. His main research area is sports injury
prevention, with a primary focus on video analysis and inverse dynamics analysis
of serious knee injuries various sports. Tron Krosshaug is devoted to lifting weights,
and claims that life quality increases with frequent bench pressing.
Feza Korkusuz, MD. Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology at Middle
East Technical University (METU). Head of METU Physical Education and Sport Department.
Studies on movement analysis of sport in laboratory and field setting.
5. Proprioception in Sports Medicine
|
Emin Ergen
|
Ankara University Medical School, Department of Sports Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
|
|
Bülent Ülkar
|
Ankara University Medical School, Department of Sports Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
|
Taner Aydın
|
GATA, Department of Sports Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
|
1. Neuromuscular training in Sports Rehabilitation. Emin Ergen
2. Clinical Importance of Proprioception. Taner Aydın
3. How to measure and evaluate proprioceptive status? Bülent Ülkar
6. SWOT Analysis of Clinical Gait Analysis
|
Gunes Yavuzer
|
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
Ankara,Turkey.
|
|
Franco Molteni
|
Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Ospedale Valduce, Costamasnaga, Italy.
|
|
Guy Molenaers
|
Clinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University
Hospital Pellenberg, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
|
|
Hans Bussmann
|
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
|
|
Henk Stam
|
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
|
|
Jaap Buurke
|
Roessingh Research & Development, Enschede, The Netherlands.
|
|
Jill Rodda
|
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne , Australia.
|
|
Kaat Desloovere
|
Clinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University
Hospital Pellenberg, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
|
|
Richard Baker
|
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Royal Childrens Hospital Parkville 3052, Victoria,
Australia.
|
|
Jozef Opara
|
"Repty" Rehab Centre Poland.
|
|
Linamara R. Battistella
|
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hospital das Clinicas, School of Medicine
at University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
|
|
James J. Carollo
|
Director, Center for Gait and Movement Analysis (CGMA)
Director, Musculoskeletal Research Center (MRC)
Associate Professor, Departments of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics
University of Colorado at Denver Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
|
7.Force Plates in Movement Analysis
|
Necip Berme
|
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Bertec Corporation, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
|
|
Cenk Güler
|
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Bertec Corporation, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
|
8. Observational Gait Analysis and Gait Deviations in Amputees
|
Serap Alsancak
|
Ankara University, Vocational School of Health,
Prosthetics and Orthotics Programme, Turkey
|
|
Haydar Altınkaynak
|
Ankara University, Vocational School of Health,
Prosthetics and Orthotics Programme, Turkey
|
|
Tim Bach
|
National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics and
Department of Human Physiology and Anatomy School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe
University, Victoria, Australia
|
|
Siegmar Blumentritt
|
Otto Bock HealthCare, Duderstadt ; Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
|
|
Yusuf Yıldız
|
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine
Department of Orthopedics and Traumotology, Turkey
|
1. Observational gait analysis in amputees. Tim Bach
2. Surgical reasons of gait deviations in amputees. Yusuf Yıldız
3. Alignment of leg prosthesis. Siegmar Blumentritt
4. Prosthetic component reasons of gait deviations. Haydar Altınkaynak
5.
Other reasons of gait deviations in amputees. Serap Alsancak
|